Tuesday, January 31, 2006
I tire of blogging about blogging, so here goes
Despite the title, I must go on with this to share my experience with blogging tools.
Qumana versus w.bloggar. Bottom line: w.bloggar wins as a client-side online/offline tool for making blog entries. I'd like to know if anyone knows of something better, and if anyone has had success running w.bloggar off as USB stick as a portable application. Now for the details.
I need an online/offine blogging tool, ideally supporting Windows and Palm, and the blogging software/services from Blogger and Movable Type.
When only dealing with the Movable Type application, I really like Sharp MT from RandyRants.com (plus his blog is much more than mildly amusing). Pocket SharpMT is is also available for PocketPC and I used these tools quite happily for my old Macromedia blog hosted on Movable Type. Unfortunately, I now have need to post on several blogs including other blogging hosts/services, and SharpMT doesn't support Blogger.
I REALLY like w.bloggar, but there are a few nits (no technorati tags, no automated pings, no support for advertising links, podcast support needs updates). The w.bloggar set-up is quick and relatively intuitive. It has a good editor with tools for inserting/formatting common HTML tags, and the ability to display a preview OR view the raw HTML. It also supports multiple blogs using multiple different services, includes spell check, and the ability to retrieve/edit old posts as well as save drafts locally, publish, or publish and post entries. It is also installs as less than <4MB, where as Qumana is closer to 9MB.
I thought I would like Qumana, but I personally found it annoying during a brief trial because:
- It adds a little promotional blurb for Qumana to each entry by default
- No ability to add "title" attribute to href links (and I strive for W3C XHTML 1.0 validation, which enforces this)
- No ability to edit inserted HTML tag for links
- Adds an auto-run and persistent system tray icon
- Preview is with IE
- Very rudimentary "Insert HTML" capability, and no ability to edit that inserted HTML other than delete
Comments:
Qumana, in one week, will fix everything you find annoying (and we find annoying too, actually). So, if you like our interface, come back in a week to try our newest beta :)
Good to hear that improvements are underway. I'd also like to see some improvements in drafts, getting previous posts, pinging IceRocket and blo.gs and some other items.
I do have some mixed feeling about the current interface, BUT I will definitely re-visit Qumana after it is updated.
Post a Comment
I do have some mixed feeling about the current interface, BUT I will definitely re-visit Qumana after it is updated.


