<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Saw It Coming, BUT&#8230; Newspapers Now, LMS Next</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobilemind.net/2009/03/they-saw-it-coming-but-newspapers-now-lms-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobilemind.net/2009/03/they-saw-it-coming-but-newspapers-now-lms-next/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on mobile computing and elearning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom King</title>
		<link>http://mobilemind.net/2009/03/they-saw-it-coming-but-newspapers-now-lms-next/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilemind.net/wp/?p=733#comment-126</guid>
		<description>On my Facebook status there&#039;s been a little back &amp; forth on this issue with well-respected colleagues from the LMS world, including a recent post from Aaron Silvers-&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We&#039;re switching, eventually, to another LMS. I&#039;ve had no say in it. A year ago, I was livid. Now, I don&#039;t care. We&#039;ve moved on.  Asynchronous, page-turning definition of E-Learning has a place, but it&#039;s not going to be the primary vehicle for our training going forward. The economic crisis has really stimulated (that&#039;s for you, Tom) a move to more meaningful, lasting long-term experiences beyond the training &quot;event.&quot; We&#039;re going with a Blended Learning model that&#039;s going to save a lot of time, money and in the process develop collaboration skills and teams.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Will it suck to use this new LMS for the compliance courses and the occasional asynchronous one-way training? Yes it will. But it will be a very small part of the ongoing development activity -- I think we&#039;ll all be okay.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I concur, Dr. King. Shake-up; Wake-up; Not an immediate Break-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my Facebook status there&#39;s been a little back &amp; forth on this issue with well-respected colleagues from the LMS world, including a recent post from Aaron Silvers-</p>
<p>We&#39;re switching, eventually, to another LMS. I&#39;ve had no say in it. A year ago, I was livid. Now, I don&#39;t care. We&#39;ve moved on.  Asynchronous, page-turning definition of E-Learning has a place, but it&#39;s not going to be the primary vehicle for our training going forward. The economic crisis has really stimulated (that&#39;s for you, Tom) a move to more meaningful, lasting long-term experiences beyond the training &quot;event.&quot; We&#39;re going with a Blended Learning model that&#39;s going to save a lot of time, money and in the process develop collaboration skills and teams.</p>
<p>Will it suck to use this new LMS for the compliance courses and the occasional asynchronous one-way training? Yes it will. But it will be a very small part of the ongoing development activity &#8212; I think we&#39;ll all be okay.</p>
<p>I concur, Dr. King. Shake-up; Wake-up; Not an immediate Break-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

