LETSI is soliciting white papers on SCORM to help identify the issues and ideas that are key priorities for the learning and training community. The submission deadline is August 15, 2008 and more information can be found on the LETSI web site SCORM 2.0 page or in the PDF file LETSI White Paper Solicitation on SCORM.
I think this is important, as we could be at the cusp of a make-or-break situation for evolution (or revolution) of learning and training infrastructure. Much of the current e-learning and LMS infrastructure is grounded in the learning and training approaches of the 1990s (’80s? ’70s??). By comparison, today’s technical and learning environment is much more “read-write”, collaborative, social and nomadic– all while being more personal and individualized.
Excuse me while I meander, ramble and eventually get to the point of why it is important.
Recently, I realized I have been unwittingly (and somewhat weakly) channelling the thoughts of Dr. David Wiley regarding the isolated “read-only” static nature of LMS-centric training, by mentioning this in conversation and scattered bullet-points in presentations over the last year. I discovered this thanks to Brian Lamb, who I have never met, but who I remotely and greatly appreciate via his blog abject learning.
Brian in a passing credit mentioned that David provided a lot of meat for many of his own presentations last year, and then lead me straight to Dr. Wiley’s 2007 presentation Openness, Localization and the Future of Learning Objects. If you can’t take the time to watch/listen to the whole presentation, I’d strongly encourage you to advance the slides and time marker to the following points:
- 30:37 Engineer invasion and the next slide, Technical standards soup (Tom adds, Mea Culpa– and I’m not even an engineer)
- 15:27 Education vs Everday (a more cogent expression of some ideas I discussed at AICC in Hamburg last month)
- 13:27 Innovative in 1995 and next slide, Education v Everyday (revisited)
If that doesn’t inspire you to respond to the call for papers, perhaps it might get the attention of Dr. Wiley or Brian Lamb.
E-learning isn’t completely broken, but current specifications and infrastructure don’t match how we live, learn and work.
Interoperability specifications can’t completely fix that, but maybe, maybe, the specification efforts can be oriented to enable and facilitate more effective and more congruent approaches. Too often they seem resistant and brittle towards innovation.
I’m certain that LETSI looks forward to learning from and sharing your white paper ideas.